![]() “We hope students can be free to focus on doing their best and not worrying that their hair will subject them to differential treatment based on race,” said Rachel Wainer Apter, director of the New Jersey Division on Civil Rights. This training, expected to be completed before the start of this year’s wrestling season, will also explain the “the long history of discrimination based on hair style.” The two agencies also agreed that NJSIAA would provide “in-person training to all of its local Rules Interpreters and to all wrestling officials in the state to emphasize that Rule 4.2.1 is based solely on hair length, not on hair style.” However, the wrestler could not find one that met the regulations. Maloney said Johnson had to wear a hair cover. His triumph was overshadowed after video footage of a white team staff member cutting his hair hit social media and incited outrage across the country.Īccording to parallel investigations by the civil rights division and NJSIAA, the referee deemed Johnson’s hair in violation of Rule 4.2.1, which “governs the length of an athlete’s hair and when an athlete must wear a hair cover.” The rule was previously interpreted by other New Jersey officials to allow wrestlers with “traditionally black hairstyles” to wear a hair cover.īut at the match, Maloney deemed Johnson’s hair to be unnatural, according to the division’s investigation. The guidance offers help to prevent such incidents in the future, saying policies that ban or restrict hairstyles associated with being black may be illegal.Īfter the forced haircut, Johnson secured a victory which helped his team beat Oakcrest High School. The civil right’s division also released new guidance on racial discrimination based on hairstyle, that warns “treating people differently due to their hairstyle” may violate the state’s anti-discrimination laws. “Racial discrimination in the enforcement of the rules of any sport is inconsistent with the spirit of fair play.” “Student athletes should be able to compete with each other on a level playing field,” said Attorney General Gurbir Grewal in a press release. “Politics in South Korea has been damaged seriously by the administration and the ruling party pushing ahead with Cho’s ministerial appointment and the opposition committed this extreme act in order to get their voices heard.WHYY thanks our sponsors - become a WHYY sponsor “It is the first time in history that the leader of the main opposition had his head shaved publicly,” Myongji University professor Shin Yul said. While many people have denounced the lawmakers’ actions as reckless and pretentious, some defended the Liberty Korea Party, saying it is the last resort for the opposition now. It could even be seen as an insult to the powerless to see these authorities shave their heads as if to put on a show.” “Politicians, such as Hwang, are not minorities in this society. ![]() ![]() “In the past, when our ancestors fought for independence and democracy, head-shaving was done by social minorities who had no power to do anything except mar their bodies as an expression of dissent,” Kim said. “I think it’s an act put up to reinforce the resolution shared inside the party and among their supporters.”Ĭultural critic Kim Sung-soo shared some insights about the significance of head shaving as a form of protest. “I don’t think Hwang is much different from other politicians in the past who shaved their heads but never did anything more,” Kim said. Kim So-ra, a 27-year old passerby who witnessed Hwang having his head shaved, also perceived the event as mere spectacle. “In order for Hwang’s shaving performance to be effective in changing the people’s opinion, the Liberty Korea Party must make efforts to overcome the hostility - stemming from the former administration and numerous political scandals surrounding the party - that some of the public still has toward them,” Choi suggested.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |